The stars wer wor cking on the street and they went shoping in Sainsprees and they didnt hav munee so they didnt paiy and the perlees tooc theem to jeyll and the stars oapend the windoa and they fleoowt and the perlees caim in and they said wear are the stars gon and looct owt off the windoa and she sor them in the scighy floating a wai in the scighy and the stars had a picnick and they had lots off fun.
By my 5 year old daughter
The heavy is the root of the light;
The still is the lord of the restless.
Therefore the gentleman when travelling all day
Never lets the heavy-laden carts out of his sight.
It is only when he is safely behind wall and watchtowers
That he rests peacefully and is above worries.
How, then, should a ruler of ten thousand chariots
Make light of his own person in the eyes of the empire?
If light, then the root is lost;
If restless, then the lord is lost.
Oh to let the heavily-laden carts of my life’s work out of sight! Oh, to be secure within myself… to be safe within my walls and watchtowers, to rest peacefully, to be rooted. In tai chi, I practise this by scanning my movements. I see how a stable, rooted right leg makes for an active, light left leg. When I stand still, I know that I am rooted to the earth, and that I can move on the earth too. It is when I practise that I am safely behind walls and watchtowers, and if I don’t, I am lost.
Multi-party parliamentary democracies cannot implement referendum results. If a party is unified on the issue for referendum, they can include it in their manifesto; if they are divided on the issue for referendum, they cannot implement it.
So the Brexit vote cannot be implemented through parliament. Implementation can only be completed by a second referendum; the question being, should we remain in the single market or not?
1. Brits don’t like being told what to do.
2. Brits back the underdog.
3. ‘Scaremongering on the economy’ doesn’t work anymore.
4. Brits like candidates who say what they believe.
In one: He could duck the issue of Brexit.
Feminism has given me the understanding of the family as the first institution of property and hierarchy, so that my family can be better understood as the first institution of shared ownership and equality.
Does feminism have the character of critique? Only if it recognises the sanctity of marriage; otherwise it is a judgment of marriage, and would have a moral character.
By analogy to capitalism: Socialist critique wishes to enhance capitalism, or succeed it; socialist judgment condemns capitalism. How is it with feminism and the family?
That much astonishment met Corbyn’s insistence on achieving peace through dialogue – rather than a readiness to use nuclear weapons – shows above all the enduring audacity of peace.
Arms manufacture being what it is, if we don’t believe in peace, we believe in annihilation.
Do we believe in peace?
One important text in our shared religious heritage is the prophesy that one day people “shall beat their swords into ploughshares.” In what sense do we believe this? When – and who – shall do this?
If we pray with St Augustine, “O Lord, help me to be pure, but not yet”, we can be sure the help will come sooner than we thought.
It would not be difficult to end the production of weapons. That would be a good step in the direction of peace.
But if we don’t want it – yet – peace might be established later by the small group of people who survivor the nuclear bomb-fire.
And if not them, then new species will, over millions of years, emerge, and they will enjoy peace on Earth again.
And if not them, then as long as it takes – “but not yet”? Or now?
To us, terrorist attacks are shocking, but not awesome, spectacles. To the terrorists, they are awesome, but not shocking. To us, the bombing of Baghdad was awesome, not shocking. To the people of Baghdad, it was shocking, not awesome. So it is when beauty is in the eye of the beholder.